Wertyboy wrote:420foxbot wrote:I win.
noooooooo you don't
MrJolteon wrote:Obviously
Wertyboy wrote:<Worst song ever>
pls dun hate me
Turon wrote:So this topic has become a contest to see whoever makes the cheesiest catchiest songs?
[RE]CONSIDER / ISSUE 199 / Profile: Alexandra
Drennan
Once a true artificial intelligence has been
created, the issue of citizenship is going to come
up. If we acknowledge that the A.I. has all the
abilities of a human brain, should it not be
considered a citizen? Is it not, in the legal sense
of the word, a person, and thus a potential
citizen?
But where do you draw the line, some people will
object. Will the great apes become citizens?
Elephants? Whales? The more intelligent parrot
species? It's crazy, they will say. I would remind
these people that we live in a society in which a
corporation, as abstract an entity as one could
imagine, is considered a person. So it's not like
there is no precedent for a nonhuman being a
person. At least an artificial intelligence is an
actual thinking being, not just a business
arrangement.
But perhaps we do need to question the definition
of personhood. Increasing amounts of evidence
regarding the intelligence of elephants or the
existence of a culture among whales, for example,
could be a sign that we need to answer some
difficult questions.
Who better to debate these questions with than the
young genius who revolutionized the f$§%&$§ &
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest