A question about "Event Actor"
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A question about "Event Actor"
by Just4Fun » Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:56 pm
When is it better to use a specific actor rather than use the "Event Actor"? It seems like they both do the same thing.
I've learned that I still have a lot to learn.
** Makslane == Genious **
** Makslane == Genious **
- Just4Fun
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 5:19 am
- Location: USA: Washington State; West Coast
- Score: 6
by ingsan » Sat Apr 24, 2004 7:53 am
Event Actor = Actor that is receiving the Event from Himself.
But what did you mean ? Using the NAME of the actor (like BALL) that would receive himself the Event instead of just leaving the Event on Event Actor ?
If you want to put an Event on BALL itself, both methods (using EventActor or its name) will give the same results. Change Event Actors to specific name whenever Events are given to other actors by Event Actor.
But what did you mean ? Using the NAME of the actor (like BALL) that would receive himself the Event instead of just leaving the Event on Event Actor ?
If you want to put an Event on BALL itself, both methods (using EventActor or its name) will give the same results. Change Event Actors to specific name whenever Events are given to other actors by Event Actor.
tout va bien ! 
http://www.pakingprod.com/MlleLafortune/V2
http://www.pakingprod.com/MlleLafortune/V2
by makslane » Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:13 pm
If you choose "Event Actor" on a action, only the actor which receives the event will execute the action.
If you use the actor name, and some clones, the actor and clones will receive the action
If you use the actor name, and some clones, the actor and clones will receive the action
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
