foleyjo wrote:I still think most of those things are not needed for the start of a revival.
(going to sound like a broken record but)
Android, and HTML 5(Or other webbased compiler) are what will breing people back.
Android support will need to have some kind of auto scaling so you don't have to worry about different phones and tablets or TV's.
It would also need support for different controllers so you can create games for devices such as Shield and JXD.
I think it would be good to allow a selection of things to compile. We already know that you can create screensavers by changing the filetype. So add the feature at compile time.
Maybe allow the making of screensavers, animated wallpapers other boot screens on android too.
The other thing to consider after adding these features would be to move the focus away from just being a game editor. Maybe someone would use it to make a little slide show for there website, or someone might make use it to customise there phone with their own background and applauncher.
Then get an impressive site made using game-editors HTML compiler.
Then make some little facebook apps such as those "What character are you" quizzes that are popular and start sending them out to people to make them go viral.
Now the clever bit about the facebook push, make some easy to edit templates for people to make there own versions of the quizzes and games. Yet in each one there will be an advert for Game-Editor and the website.
That is how I would start a revival.
Then I would start work on all the other features .
Also Game-Editor IS Game-editor and noone will start ruining its avocation. If you want to make screensavers, use Easy "ScreenSaver Studio" why the hell Game-Editor.
Turning Game-Editor into something else, is not possible unfortunatelly, but i can suggest you other good programs if you want to build Facebook games, animations etc if want.
foleyjo wrote:do you not think that might be the problem?
7 years ago (actually it's more 2 - 3 years ago but we will use your 7) this was a very active forum with people trying new things. It was a time when people still downloaded 2D games to play on pcs.
Now there seems to be a small number of people developing and from what I've read, they seem to start out with GE and then move on to development tools that allow them to do more things.
Now people don't want to play 2D games on pcs. People want to play games on facebook and share there scores, or invite others to join in. People want to download apps for their latest phone. Apps that do cool things and apps that do pointless things that pass a couple of minutes while waiting for the bus.
It is true that I am into programs from the last milenium. I have a vast collection of games from the 80's and 90's. Though I'm not sure how that relates to my suggestions?
Also the following is dictating what people can use GE for.Also Game-Editor IS Game-editor and noone will start ruining its avocation. If you want to make screensavers, use Easy "ScreenSaver Studio" why the hell Game-Editor.
Turning Game-Editor into something else, is not possible unfortunatelly, but i can suggest you other good programs if you want to build Facebook games, animations etc if want.
foleyjo wrote:What is your plan exactly?
You want people to advertise GE. How do you expect that to go
"Hey Game-Editor whats that"
"Oh it's a program that you can use to make games"
"Oh I know nothing about programming I couldn't make a game"
"That's OK it allows you to make games with very little programming experience"
"Hey that sounds cool. Could I make a game like flappy bird"
"Yeah easy"
"Will I be able to make games for the PSN and Xbox market place"
"Don't be silly"
"Well what about for my DS or Vita"
"Nope"
"Will I be able to put it on my phone/tablet"
"Yeah it has IOS support"
"My phone is one of those new Samsungs with Android"
"Erm well yeah but you got to download this other software and mess about with loads of settings, oh and you have to make sure you get the resolution perfect"
"hmm that sounds a bit complicated, well can I put it on facebook or make it playable on my website"
"Erm no but you can upload it somewhere and put a link to download it"
"Well I have an idea for this app that..."
"Is it a game"
"Well not exactly but it uses 2D graphics that you can move about and..."
"No Game-Editor is for games and you will not start ruining its avocation."
"Hey it say's here I can make GP2X games. I still have one of them"
"Oh yeah ignore that it doesn't actually do anything"
"So what else can I do"
"You can put 3D raytraced models in your game"
"Oh right. Well I don't know anything about making 3D models.
"Oh well thats about it then"
"OK................ Hey have you seen this game-maker. It lets me do everything I asked about. Can't I just use that"
"Well yeah if you have last-known milenium understandings"
"OK well bye then. Enjoy your game-editor"
foleyjo wrote:You asked for suggestions on how to revive and I offered you some based on the alternatives.
There were 2 reasons I chose game-editor this time round.
1 - I already know how to use it.
2 - There is no expensive license for me to test my game on my JXD android handheld device.
At first I wasn't even sure if anything had changed because at first glance everything seemed exactly the same as a few years back.
To be perfectly honest I would probably have chosen gamemaker if the andoird license price wasn't so high.
You say that the things I want are things people like me want. Well that is true but at the same time the things I want is based on what the target audience for what I want to make is interested in.
Android you did say and I am aware is being worked on. I suggested other ways android support could be utilised.
I mentioned how HTML5 and facebook support could be an advertising feature if it was added.
I don't know how the compilers work and if this would be possible but nowhere in your replies did you say
"this won't be possible because...."
(except your last reply that is, but that doesn't actually make clear why it's not possible, I assume it's due to lack of interest from people developing GE)
foleyjo wrote:Surely the point of your revival is to bring new people in and old people back.
Yet from your prior post you are suggesting that the point of the revival is to make things better for the people who are already using it.
If you want to encourage new people then you need to look at where GE is lacking compared to it's main competitors.
If you just want to keep it as niche tool for people already here then as you said, you need to iron out the bugs and introduce those features people have been waiting on.
So what is it that you really want to achieve here? Increased userbase for modern technologies or less buggy interface for outdated technologies.
Bearing in mind that it's only really when you start advanced development things get buggy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest